Dear All,

Below is another piece of masterful spin from Dr. Robert Hall, the Chief Health Officer for the state of Victoria in Australia. This is the same man who looked me straight in the eye in 2004 and said that “neither I nor my staff have any intention of answering your 50 reasons in writing” and when asked why he thought the level of fluoride in mothers milk was over 100 times less than the 1 ppm added to water, said “So nature has dealt some children a poor deal.”

Here he spins Bassin’s findings on osteosarcoma as being of no consquence to water fluoridation. His major thrust is that there are only a few cases of osteosarcoma each year in Victoria (we heard similar arguments in Burlington, Vermont). Oh how I wish we could organize a visit by Dr. Hall to the home of one of the Victorian families whose child has died from osteosarcoma and have him read this statement to them.

It is also very revealing that given this opportunity to address the dangers posed by water fluoridation that he made no comment on the 450 page NRC report (March 22, 2006) which documented many other health concerns in addition to osteosarcoma. Instead he cites a 2004 Australian Health Ministers’ statement, and and a 2005 WHO report, to support his claim that water fluoridation poses no health concerns. A dilgent health officer should not pick and choose the science.

“Dr.” Hall has changed the Hippocratic oath from “First Do No Harm” to “Spin Away All Harm.”

Paul Connett

————————————————————————

No alarm on fluoride: cancer risk unproven

“A thorough review of a recently published paper on a possible association between fluoride and osteosarcoma has not diminished the view that water fluoridation is a safe, effective public health measure for preventing tooth decay,” Dr Hall said.

“The incidence of osteosarcoma in Australia is very low, with an average of nine to ten cases diagnosed each year in children under the age of 15. In Victoria, an average of two to three are diagnosed each year.

“A thorough reading of the recent report shows that the authors say their work is an ‘exploratory analysis’ that will require further scientific confirmation to validate or refute the findings.

“Further, the data in this paper is part of a much more comprehensive 15-year study by the Harvard School of Dental Medicine which is yet to be published. The principal researcher of the larger study has warned against drawing any conclusions before seeing the full study, which will not suggest an overall association between fluoride and osteosarcoma.

“From our perspective there is nothing in this study which should prevent the public from continuing to enjoy the proven health benefits of optimally fluoridated water.

“The overwhelming scientific consensus is that water fluoridation does not increase the risk of osteosarcoma and major systematic and expert reviews have not identified any increased risk of cancer associated with drinking fluoridated water,” Dr Hall said.

Health authorities around the world support the fluoridation of water supplies as a safe, effective, inexpensive and socially equitable way to help reduce tooth decay in children and adults.

“The World Health Organisation in 2005 reiterated its support for water fluoridation stating that at recommended levels it is a highly effective strategy to control dental caries in both children and adults, and is safe for the environment and human health in general,” Dr Hall said.

“In 2004, all Australian Health Ministers endorsed water fluoridation as a national oral health initiative - a key action in Healthy Mouths Healthy Lives: Australia’s Oral Health Plan 2004-2013,” he said.

Osteosarcoma is a primary bone cancer that usually affects young adults. Primary bone cancer, or cancer that starts in the bone, is very rare. Less than one per cent of people with bone cancer have primary bone cancer.

The causes of primary bone cancer are not known and epidemiological studies show no clear association between fluoride in drinking water and osteosarcoma.