FAN Bulletin #969

June 12, 2008

Dear Supporter,

I am sorry I have been neglecting communication on some of the other important events on the fluoridation front (I will send out a round up of events in a bulletin sometime this weekend) but right now we are focused on trying to stop the mandatory fluoridation bill going through in Louisiana. On this we are down to the wire. The House is due to debate (and probably vote) on SB 312 TODAY (Thursday June 12th) which will bring mandatory fluoridation to Louisiana. This has been done largely by stealth and not open debate. I suspect the vast majority of Louisiana’s citizens have no idea that this happening and will only find out when they wake up tomorrow (if then).

Thanks to you all for sending in the online messages. To date over 1,100 have been sent. Thanks also to local folks who have phoned their reps. Below is a story in one of the few newspapers in Louisiana to share this story with their readers. In the article State Senator Thompson explains why he thinks this is a good bill for which “there’s no downside unless you don’t pass it and then kids and the elderly people won’t get the fluoride they need.”

To turn this around remains a huge long shot because we found out about this so late, but I couldn’t live with myself if we didn’t try everything we could to avert this unnecessary and avoidable threat to the people of Louisiana. So if you have the time and energy please use our online message machinery at http://tinyurl.com/522jcc to send in another message. We’ve left the message blank, so you’ll need to use your own words. You might consider starting with the following line and filling in the blank:

“Senator Francis Thompson says that with mandatory fluoridation (SB 312): “There’s no downside unless you don’t pass it and then kids and the elderly people won’t get the fluoride they need.” In my view there are many downsides, here is one:……..  Please vote NO on SB312, or at least delay the vote until you have heard BOTH SIDES on this issue.”

My preferred title: No Downside to SB 312? You must be joking! but it would be better if you came up with your own title so they don’t think it is the same message coming from everyone.

Paul Connett

###

http://www.ouachitacitizen.com/news.php?id=2357

Thompson defends fluoridation measure

by Michael DeVault - posted Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 @ 9:47 pm
 E-mail This Story |  Print This Story

A proposal to require some municipal water systems to maintain fluoride levels in drinking water is being touted as necessary by some legislator while simultaneously being labeled as “draconian” by a citizens watchdog group.

State Sen. Francis Thompson said Senate Bill 312 would mean healthier teeth for children across the state and that’s important because, according to Thompson, many children do not brush properly.

“The water they drink will sustain their teeth until they get to school and can get proper attention,” said Thompson, D-Delhi.

However, a citizens advocacy group opposes the legislation because of what that group said were negative side effects of fluoridation.

Fluoride is a compound dentists have long-touted as beneficial to maintaining healthy teeth. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, many municipal water systems began putting the compound in drinking water.

Dr. Paul Connett, of the Fluoride Action Network, said passing SB 312 would be a mistake for children and families.

Connett said he was disturbed by the lack of opposition to the proposal, which the House of Representatives is expected to consider Thursday (today).

“If they get it Thursday, then Louisiana is saddled with mandatory fluoridation,” said Connett, who holds a Ph.D. in environmental chemistry and toxicology.

Connett cautioned legislators against fluoridation in an e-mail, which he forwarded to The Ouachita Citizen.

Connett said recent studies indicate fluoride in drinking water can have an adverse affect on the developing brains of young children.

“We are giving our babies 250 times more fluoride than nature intended at a time when the blood brain barrier is not fully formed,” said Connett. “That simply is not a wise thing to do, especially now that we have over 40 animal studies which indicate that fluoride damages the brain and 18 studies — three published last year alone — which show that fluoride lowers the IQ in children at levels as low as 1.8 parts per million.”

Connett’s group has been working to raise awareness of the ill effects of fluoridation. He hopes Thursday’s vote on SB 312 would draw attention to the issue of mandatory fluoridation.

Thompson was quick to point out that SB 312 entails an opt-out clause for municipalities and only affects water systems with more than 5,000 customers.

“Under this law, if you don’t have the ability or money to do it, then you don’t have to do it,” Thompson said.

SB 312 also makes room for municipalities to avoid fluoridation by popular vote in a general election.

Thompson said that, because SB 312 compliance is optional, the bill was a good one.

“There’s no downside unless you don’t pass it and then kids and the elderly people won’t get the fluoride they need,” Thompson said.